July 22, 2007

20 gram Links for July 21st ‘07

Posted at 10:31 am by del.icio.us and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Popularity: 38% [?]

Here are some of the sites I’ve been looking at recently, that I wanted to share:

June 20, 2007

Why Some People Resist Science

Posted at 3:40 pm by Richard and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Popularity: 13% [?]

I found an interesting article today about why some people resist science, and what these authors suggest is that distrust in science can be traced back to how science and alternative views are presented to children.

Jesus and Baby DinoEssentially, in matters for which we are unable to understand and evaluate the facts for ourselves, we try to evaluate the trustworthiness of the source.

Few of us are qualified to assess claims about the merits of string theory, the role in mercury in the etiology of autism, or the existence of repressed memories. So rather than evaluating the asserted claim itself, we instead evaluate the claim’s source. If the source is deemed trustworthy, people will believe the claim, often without really understanding it.1

It seems only natural, and a perfectly valid way of making up your opinions about things. The problem occurs when we don’t know what sources to trust.

(Scientific claims) clash with intuitive beliefs about the immaterial nature of the soul and the purposeful design of humans and other animals — and, in the United States, these intuitive beliefs are particularly likely to be endorsed and transmitted by trusted religious and political authorities.1

If our own political leaders (Well, thankfully not my political leaders to the same degree - although he did seem a little iffy on global warming for quite a while) show an inherent distrust of science, and people are brought up to believe the church is a reputable source of scientific knowledge, is it any wonder that there’s so much distrust of science?

I’ve read suggestions by scientists that claim that it’s simply not worth arguing with creationists in public forums because those who listen to the creationists already distrust science, and nothing they say (no matter how rational) will convert them. Maybe we need to start earlier? I read a post the other day (dammed2 if I could find it again - help me out if you know what I’m talking about) that suggested the idea of creating a textbook for use in school which rationally outlined the creationist vs. evolution debate in an easy-to-understand yet scientifically accurate way. Maybe if we can help establish that scientists are the ones who should be trusted when it comes to scientific matters3, and not politicians or the church.

(Via A Whore in the Temple of Reason)

  1. Bloom, Paul & Weisberg, Deena S. (2007) Why Do Some People Resist Science? []
  2. Figuratively, of course []
  3. I can’t believe this actually needs to be said! []

June 13, 2007

Flat Earth Theory

Posted at 12:01 am by Richard and tagged , , , , , , . Popularity: 10% [?]

… and you thought Creationists lived with their head in the sands.

Flat EarthI found a podcast recently by The Infidel Guy, where he discusses a group I couldn’t believe actually existed today - The Flat Earth Society.

On this podcast, he discusses the beliefs of the Flat Earth Society who still believe that the earth is actually flat. A round disk, centred at the north pole, with a 150ft ice wall which keeps all the water in. How is it, then, that us “Round Earthers” are utterly convinced that the earth is actually round? Well, it’s a world-wide government conspriacy. One of the most disturbing things about this, is these views are apparently not motivated by religious dogma, but rather… just plain stupidity!

Have a read of their FAQ to fully understand just how nuts these views are. While it appears that the actual number of members who believe what they preach is small, I’m still hoping it’s just a big joke, but even Pastafarianists don’t take things that far.

(I wanted to find a nice picture of Discworld to use on this post, but I couldn’t find one that I could use without breaking copyright)

June 12, 2007

20 gram Links for June 11th ‘07

Posted at 10:36 am by del.icio.us and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Popularity: 25% [?]

Here are some of the sites I’ve been looking at recently, that I wanted to share:

Close
E-mail It