<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passive Aggressive Christians</title>
	<atom:link href="http://20gramsoul.com/2007/09/29/passive-aggressive-christians/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/09/29/passive-aggressive-christians/</link>
	<description>Friendly outgoing eclectic agnostic seeks one gram of soul</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/09/29/passive-aggressive-christians/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20gramsoul.com/2007/09/29/passive-aggressive-christians/#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>Hey cool site, and the passive agressive notes is hilarious.

I was once a questioner like yourself but now follow a more humanistic, scientific philosophy. Most of these religion questions are really non questions when you really look at them.

If no one can agree on them or even moderatly prove them to some small degree then obviously the questions or the answers are being framed in the wrong way. The religious texts are all the understanding of people a long time ago. Sciencetific ideas can be very &quot;spiritual&quot;, that is fullfil the same functions if you understand them deeply enough. Unfortunately not many people do..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey cool site, and the passive agressive notes is hilarious.</p>
<p>I was once a questioner like yourself but now follow a more humanistic, scientific philosophy. Most of these religion questions are really non questions when you really look at them.</p>
<p>If no one can agree on them or even moderatly prove them to some small degree then obviously the questions or the answers are being framed in the wrong way. The religious texts are all the understanding of people a long time ago. Sciencetific ideas can be very &#8220;spiritual&#8221;, that is fullfil the same functions if you understand them deeply enough. Unfortunately not many people do..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

