<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Rudy Rucker Showed Me God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/</link>
	<description>Friendly outgoing eclectic agnostic seeks one gram of soul</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 20 gram Soul : Soft Atheist, Hard Agnostic</title>
		<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>20 gram Soul : Soft Atheist, Hard Agnostic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] exist. I am also, however, open to the idea that perhaps &#8220;God&#8221; (if he exists) is nothing like that described by traditional religion, and therefore may one day be provable. For me, the problem with the traditional notions of God are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exist. I am also, however, open to the idea that perhaps &#8220;God&#8221; (if he exists) is nothing like that described by traditional religion, and therefore may one day be provable. For me, the problem with the traditional notions of God are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I think one of the greatest things about the metaphor is just that - we wouldn&#039;t necessarily know they were from a higher dimension, because we&#039;d only see a small 3-dimensional cross section of them (like A. Square only sees another square when A. Cube visits him). A 4-dimensional being could probably make themselves look like all sorts of weird shapes/forms by simply showing a different cross-section.

As I&#039;ve said - not that I &lt;i&gt;believe&lt;/i&gt; that &quot;God&quot; (if there is such a thing) is a creature from a higher dimension - but it&#039;s a pretty cool idea, and it could help explain some of the more traditional notions of God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think one of the greatest things about the metaphor is just that &#8211; we wouldn&#8217;t necessarily know they were from a higher dimension, because we&#8217;d only see a small 3-dimensional cross section of them (like A. Square only sees another square when A. Cube visits him). A 4-dimensional being could probably make themselves look like all sorts of weird shapes/forms by simply showing a different cross-section.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said &#8211; not that I <i>believe</i> that &#8220;God&#8221; (if there is such a thing) is a creature from a higher dimension &#8211; but it&#8217;s a pretty cool idea, and it could help explain some of the more traditional notions of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: globalizati</title>
		<link>http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>globalizati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20gramsoul.com/2007/06/17/how-rudy-rucker-showed-me-god/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I loved Flatland when I read it as a kid, but haven&#039;t picked it up in years. One thing that strikes me now is that this metaphor is an excellent illustration of how God is possible. However, if there is a fourth dimension that we are incapable of experience, we wouldn&#039;t know about it until someone from that dimension interacted with us.. and how would we know that? Just some thoughts.. cheers,
globalizati</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Flatland when I read it as a kid, but haven&#8217;t picked it up in years. One thing that strikes me now is that this metaphor is an excellent illustration of how God is possible. However, if there is a fourth dimension that we are incapable of experience, we wouldn&#8217;t know about it until someone from that dimension interacted with us.. and how would we know that? Just some thoughts.. cheers,<br />
globalizati</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

